Lower latency & cost by design
Deterministic tier routing routes “easy” requests to cheaper model tiers that clear a computed threshold. You stop paying frontier prices for trivial calls.
Deterministic tier routing routes “easy” requests to cheaper model tiers that clear a computed threshold. You stop paying frontier prices for trivial calls.
Truth-table constraints enforce vision/tools/code/local/audited PII support ahead of model calls. Violations are listed as rule-by-rule receipts.
Each decision path exposes the threshold math, surface demand signals, violations, and cost estimates. Reviewers can audit behavior deterministically.
I treat AI like a control system: identity (what this request is), behavior (what we allow), and state (what happens next). The runtime is the product: routers, gates, tool registries, and agent loops are first-class code.
I aim for a measurable outcome every time: cost, latency, failure-path clarity, and bounded tool access.
I use a deterministic surface-derived threshold plus manifold demand signals to choose the cheapest eligible tier.
Business impact (plain English): Cuts AI spend and improves response time by routing most requests to smaller tiers automatically.
Proof via visual: (Add GIF/screenshot of a routing receipt showing tier + threshold)
Hard constraints filter tiers that don’t support what the request requires; violations show up explicitly.
Business impact (plain English): Prevents costly retries and “wrong capability” failures; improves reliability.
The IDE runs locally, then optionally bridges out. It executes parsed tool_calls deterministically and keeps tool access scoped.
Business impact (plain English): Lets teams build and test AI workflows locally, reducing risk and speeding iteration.
What to expect: AI responses include routing receipts and may execute tool calls (in deterministic + receipt mode).
Optional GIF: (paste a link to your demo GIF here)